Let’s take a look at the relative performance of the 9 major sectors represented by the Select Sector Spider ETFs compared with the S&P 500. (Link in the right column to the Sector Spiders website)
First, however, let’s talk about conventional wisdom for the person not interested in the markets or actively investing. The general consensus seems to be that over the long, LONG term, investing broadly in the market (some mix of broad market funds including big and small caps, growth and value, etc.) will bring you an average annual return of 10%. I found a somewhat amusing and mildly assuring column from USA Today on the subject as the first result in a Google search. I say, “Mildly,” because it makes sense, statistically, but that sure isn’t very convincing or reassuring in the face of some major problems nationally and globally that don’t look like they’ll be going away anytime soon. Economic slowdown(recession?), Energy issues, war, etc.
“Statistics show that large-cap stocks (measured by the Standard & Poor’s 500) have produced 10.4% yearly returns on average over the past 79 years through 2004, according to data from IFA.com,” writes Matt Krantz. “What about inflation? Certainly, the declining purchasing power of the dollar over time does erode returns. To be exact, the 10.4% annual return of the S&P 500 is actually 7.2% if you adjust for inflation, according to data from Standard & Poor’s.
“But keep in mind that just investing in the S&P 500 is not adequate. You need to add other asset classes to your portfolio, including small-cap stocks, which have returned 9.1% returns on average a year even after inflation. Foreign stocks and emerging markets stocks, which have a place in many investors’ portfolios, have done even better.”
But doesn’t being invested in more than just a broad fund that matches the market involve some active choices of what funds, what foreign funds, when and if to sell and change funds, etc.? For the sake of the discussion, let’s assume that the average uninterested and investment-wise uneducated person will do the “buy and hold” approach to a fund or group of funds that are comparable to the S&P500.
While ten years is arguably not quite the “Long term,” in terms of a lifetime, and perhaps not the time frame they mean when siting this average annual return of 10%, how long is long enough to judge what works NOW, from this moment forward? I woudl think ten years is sufficient. The most recent ten years seems plenty more relevant than any ten year period before it, to say the least.
Here’s the most recent ten years in the S&P 500. To be fair, this may not be an entirely accurate representation since I don’t think the index itself would include the payment of dividends, but it’s at least a ballpark for discussion.
The index is up approximately 35%. With compounding interest, an annual 10% gain over ten years should result in a profit of 159.37%. Even adding dividends, I suspect the gain over ten years in the SPX would not be anywhere near this figure. (For the record, I am FAR from an accountant or CPA.)
So let’s look at the prospects for potentially investing in selected funds that show relative strength. I think it’s reasonable to say that most people could look at 9 sector funds every few months and try to stay balanced in 4 that are more toward the best performing ones, or at least stay out of the worst performing ones. Here is a comparison using the Select Sector Spiders, described on their website as such: “Select Sector SPDRs are unique ETF’s that divide the S&P 500 into 9 sectors. To strengthen your portfolio, simply choose the sectors that fit your investment needs.” (Judging from the chart, they weren’t introduced until December of ‘98.)
(Click image to see it bigger)

I think most of us, even those who only peripherally pay attention to the news could know that the Energy sector has been very strong for a number of years and that from early 2000 to late 2003 the tech. sector got cushed, losing 80% of its value. Is it not reasonable to think that even with less than precise timing, a self guided investor could have gotten out of tech somewhere along that plunge and could have later gotten into Energy sometime along its ascent? Keep in mind that I say this with the idea of someone looking at only these 9 ETFs consistently every few weeks or month or so. Here’s a comparison of the last five years.
By adding all of the Select Sector Spiders using the “comparison chart” function under Chart Settings, you can see a percentage comparison of all of the 9 sector ETFs versus the SPX or whatever stock or index you’re interested in for any time frame. SPX makes the most sense, of course, and should fall somewhere in the middle of the pack at any given time.
Here is a look at the last year. The top performing sectors were Industrials, Consumer Staples and Utilities, in that order.

Now the last 3 months, particularly relevant considering the downdraft solidifying the bear market and the increasing likelihood of a recession.

Healthcare is leading the way, followed by consumer staples. Coming in third, just barely above the middle of the pack, is Utilitites. These first two are sectors thought of as “defensive,” because regardless of a potentially poor economy, health and basic needs will always be a primary destination for money. Utilities are also somewhat defensive because most utilities are not focused on growth and therefore rather than reinvesting their earnings toward growth, they tend to pay dividends.
In the healthcare ETF, the XLV, the top holding is Johnson and Johnson, making up 13% of the fund. Nice move above resistance and then test of new support at 68 before shooting higher.

Proctor and Gamble makes up 16% of the XLP consumer staples ETF followed by Walmart at 11%. PG hasn’t had such a beautiful year to date, but just this week it seems to be breaking the downtrend.

Walmart, on the other hand, looks to have had a great year so far. Not only did it alreaday have a nice run, but after some months of consolidation, it appears to be moving higher out of that range this week.

I think you catch my drift. And I think this post has gone on WAY too long.
The SPX is down roughly 12% from this time last year and roughly 11% year to date. How do we feel about holding those broad market funds for the last year? Is it reassuring that, statistically speaking, at some point it’ll all work out so that this year was really as good as a 10% gain?